Team B (which has never seen the original code) writes new code based solely on that specification. By using an AI that was prompted with the original LGPL code, the maintainers bypassed this wall. If the AI “learned” from the LGPL code to produce the new version, the resulting output is arguably a derivative work, which under the LGPL, must remain LGPL.
Deprecated: --moduleResolution classic
，这一点在电影中也有详细论述
3月5日消息，中国国航公告，公司副董事长、董事、总裁王明远因退休，申请辞去公司副董事长、董事及总裁等职务，辞职后将不再担任公司及控股子公司的任何职务，辞职申请自2026年3月5日起生效。中国国航同日公告，第七届董事会第十三次会议审议并通过关于聘任曲光吉为公司总裁和提名为董事、副董事长人选的议案。
"The current bill requires AI companies to design and implement SSPs that meet certain standards – for example they must include testing sufficient to provide a "reasonable assurance" that the AI system will not cause a catastrophe, and must "consider" yet-to-be-written guidance from state agencies. To enforce these standards, the state can sue AI companies for large penalties, even if no actual harm has occurred."
（一）要求行政执法机关自查、说明情况；